Ecuador vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Ecuador
17.2%
in 2022
South Africa
19.2%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
4th
South Africa rank
1st
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 19.2% against 17.2% in Ecuador, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 1st of 36 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.7% | 17.8% | 3.1% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 12.8% | 19.3% | 6.5% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 19.2% against 17.2% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 2.0%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Ecuador ranks 4th and South Africa ranks 1st of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population