Ecuador vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Ecuador
17.2%
in 2022
Serbia
17.4%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
4th
Serbia rank
2nd
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 17.4% against 17.2% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.9% | 14.3% | 1.4% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 16.3% | 18.2% | 1.9% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 17.4% against 17.2% in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 0.2%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Ecuador ranks 4th and Serbia ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population