Peru vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory
Peru
0.2%
in 2022
South Africa
0.2%
in 2021
Peru rank
28th
South Africa rank
29th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 29th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3% | 5.7% | 5.4% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 0.2% against 0.2% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
- Peru ranks 28th and South Africa ranks 29th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population