Serbia vs Uruguay: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Serbia
16.9%
in 2022
Uruguay
14.9%
in 2022
Serbia rank
1st
Uruguay rank
2nd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16.9% against 14.9% in Uruguay, a difference of 2.0%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Uruguay ahead.
Serbia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11.3% | 14.8% | 3.5% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 16.0% | 15.2% | 0.8% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Serbia, at 16.9% against 14.9% in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 2.0%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Serbia ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population