Peru vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Peru
8.7%
in 2022
South Africa
8.7%
in 2021
Peru rank
22nd
South Africa rank
23rd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 8.7% against 8.7% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Peru ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.9% | 16.8% | 11.9% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 6.8% | 6.8% | 0.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 8.7% against 8.7% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Peru ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population