Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Brazil
9.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
10.1%
in 2020
Brazil rank
18th
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 10.1% against 9.5% in Brazil, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 36 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.9% | 7.4% | 1.5% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 11.9% | 9.9% | 2.0% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 9.5% | 10.1% | 0.6% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 10.1% against 9.5% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Brazil ranks 18th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population