Armenia vs Chile: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Armenia
13.6%
in 2022
Chile
14.3%
in 2022
Armenia rank
6th
Chile rank
3rd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 14.3% against 13.6% in Armenia, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 6th and Chile ranks 3rd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.0% | 14.6% | 1.5% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 12.7% | 14.1% | 1.5% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Armenia or Chile?
- Chile, at 14.3% against 13.6% in Armenia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Armenia and Chile?
- 0.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Armenia ranks 6th and Chile ranks 3rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population