Georgia vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Georgia
15.3%
in 2021
Serbia
22.8%
in 2022
Georgia rank
2nd
Serbia rank
1st
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 22.8% against 15.3% in Georgia, a difference of 7.5%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.5 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 1st of 36 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 10.7% | 11.3% | 0.6% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 15.3% | 15.8% | 0.5% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 22.8% against 15.3% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Georgia and Serbia?
- 7.5%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Georgia ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 1st of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population