Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Kazakhstan
10.9%
in 2021
Serbia
10.6%
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
11th
Serbia rank
13th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 10.9% against 10.6% in Serbia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Serbia ranks 13th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.2% | 11.0% | 1.2% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 10.9% | 12.9% | 2.0% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 10.9% against 10.6% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0.3%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Kazakhstan ranks 11th and Serbia ranks 13th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population