El Salvador vs Mongolia: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
El Salvador
6.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
7.2%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
28th
Mongolia rank
25th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 7.2% against 6.3% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.9%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 28th and Mongolia ranks 25th of 35 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.0% | 8.3% | 4.3% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 5.3% | 8.3% | 3.0% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 7.2% against 6.3% in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 0.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- El Salvador ranks 28th and Mongolia ranks 25th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population