Ecuador vs South Africa: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Ecuador
8.4%
in 2022
South Africa
8.7%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
25th
South Africa rank
23rd
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 8.7% against 8.4% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.7% | 16.8% | 7.1% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 8.1% | 6.8% | 1.3% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 8.7% against 8.4% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 23rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population