Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Ecuador
8.4%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
8.2%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
25th
Kyrgyzstan rank
27th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 8.4% against 8.2% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 25th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.6% | 9.1% | 0.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 8.1% | 8.2% | 0.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 8.4% against 8.2% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.2%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 27th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population