Argentina vs Poland: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private
Argentina
10.5%
in 2022
Poland
9.9%
in 2019
Argentina rank
13th
Poland rank
15th
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private over time
- Argentina
- Poland
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 10.5% against 9.9% in Poland, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Argentina ranks 13th and Poland ranks 15th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.2% | 8.3% | 2.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 13.9% | 9.9% | 4.0% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private, Argentina or Poland?
- Argentina, at 10.5% against 9.9% in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private between Argentina and Poland?
- 0.6%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Poland rank globally for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
- Argentina ranks 13th and Poland ranks 15th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population