Peru vs South Africa: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile
Peru
0.0496 poorest
in 2022
South Africa
0.0439 poorest
in 2021
Peru rank
26th
South Africa rank
27th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.0496 poorest against 0.0439 poorest in South Africa, a difference of 0.0057 poorest.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 27th of 34 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0282 poorest | 0.0531 poorest | 0.0249 poorest | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.0384 poorest | 0.0396 poorest | 0.0012 poorest | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile, Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 0.0496 poorest against 0.0439 poorest in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.0057 poorest, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile?
- Peru ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 27th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)