Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile
Kyrgyzstan
0.3645 poorest
in 2020
Poland
0.3667 poorest
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
7th
Poland rank
6th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.3667 poorest against 0.3645 poorest in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0022 poorest.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Poland ranks 6th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2253 poorest | 0.3271 poorest | 0.1018 poorest | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.3681 poorest | 0.3553 poorest | 0.0128 poorest | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.3667 poorest against 0.3645 poorest in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.0022 poorest, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 7th and Poland ranks 6th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)