Armenia vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile
Armenia
0.3494 poorest
in 2022
Poland
0.3667 poorest
in 2019
Armenia rank
8th
Poland rank
6th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.3667 poorest against 0.3494 poorest in Armenia, a difference of 0.0173 poorest.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Armenia ranks 8th and Poland ranks 6th of 33 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3569 poorest | 0.3471 poorest | 0.0098 poorest | Armenia |
| 2010s | 0.3513 poorest | 0.3538 poorest | 0.0026 poorest | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.3667 poorest against 0.3494 poorest in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile between Armenia and Poland?
- 0.0173 poorest, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile?
- Armenia ranks 8th and Poland ranks 6th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)