Peru vs South Africa: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)
Peru
0.0678
in 2022
South Africa
0.0521
in 2021
Peru rank
27th
South Africa rank
29th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.0678 against 0.0521 in South Africa, a difference of 0.0157.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 29th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0552 | 0.0605 | 0.0053 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.0557 | 0.0482 | 0.0075 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest), Peru or South Africa?
- Peru, at 0.0678 against 0.0521 in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.0157, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)?
- Peru ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 29th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)