Mongolia vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)
Mongolia
0.3137
in 2020
Poland
0.3736
in 2019
Mongolia rank
11th
Poland rank
7th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.3736 against 0.3137 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0599.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 11th and Poland ranks 7th of 33 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2816 | 0.3561 | 0.0745 | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.2954 | 0.3612 | 0.0658 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest), Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.3736 against 0.3137 in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.0599, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)?
- Mongolia ranks 11th and Poland ranks 7th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)