Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)
Kyrgyzstan
0.3484
in 2020
Poland
0.3736
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
8th
Poland rank
7th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.3736 against 0.3484 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0252.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Poland ranks 7th of 34 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2966 | 0.3363 | 0.0396 | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.3615 | 0.3636 | 0.0021 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest), Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.3736 against 0.3484 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.0252, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Poland ranks 7th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)