Ecuador vs South Africa: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)
Ecuador
0.051
in 2022
South Africa
0.0521
in 2021
Ecuador rank
30th
South Africa rank
29th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.0521 against 0.051 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0011.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 29th of 34 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0656 | 0.0605 | 0.005 | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0464 | 0.0482 | 0.0018 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest), Ecuador or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.0521 against 0.051 in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0.0011, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)?
- Ecuador ranks 30th and South Africa ranks 29th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)