Chile vs Uruguay: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)
Chile
0.1907
in 2022
Uruguay
0.1439
in 2022
Chile rank
15th
Uruguay rank
17th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.1907 against 0.1439 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0468.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 17th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1674 | 0.1174 | 0.05 | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.1075 | 0.1619 | 0.0544 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.1531 | 0.1481 | 0.005 | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest), Chile or Uruguay?
- Chile, at 0.1907 against 0.1439 in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) between Chile and Uruguay?
- 0.0468, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions - 1st quintile (poorest)?
- Chile ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 17th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)