Peru vs South Africa: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest)
Peru
0.04
in 2022
South Africa
0.0536
in 2021
Peru rank
27th
South Africa rank
24th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Peru
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.0536 against 0.04 in Peru, a difference of 0.0136.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times Peru's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 24th of 31 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0282 | 0.0869 | 0.0587 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.0302 | 0.0446 | 0.0145 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest), Peru or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.0536 against 0.04 in Peru as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest) between Peru and South Africa?
- 0.0136, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Peru and South Africa rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest)?
- Peru ranks 27th and South Africa ranks 24th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)