Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest)
Kyrgyzstan
0.3742
in 2020
Poland
0.3846
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Poland rank
4th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.3846 against 0.3742 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0104.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th and Poland ranks 4th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2112 | 0.3323 | 0.1211 | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.3716 | 0.3629 | 0.0087 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest), Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.3846 against 0.3742 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest) between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.0104, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th and Poland ranks 4th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)