Brazil vs South Africa: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest)
Brazil
0.0942
in 2022
South Africa
0.0536
in 2021
Brazil rank
22nd
South Africa rank
24th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Brazil
- South Africa
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.0942 against 0.0536 in South Africa, a difference of 0.0406.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.8 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 24th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0724 | 0.0878 | 0.0154 | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.0852 | 0.0446 | 0.0406 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest), Brazil or South Africa?
- Brazil, at 0.0942 against 0.0536 in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest) between Brazil and South Africa?
- 0.0406, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and South Africa rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest)?
- Brazil ranks 22nd and South Africa ranks 24th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)