Armenia vs Chile: Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest)
Armenia
0.3262
in 2022
Chile
0.259
in 2022
Armenia rank
12th
Chile rank
14th
Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Armenia
- Chile
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.3262 against 0.259 in Chile, a difference of 0.0672.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 12th and Chile ranks 14th of 31 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.3693 | 0.1663 | 0.2031 | Armenia |
| 2010s | 0.3653 | 0.1181 | 0.2472 | Armenia |
| 2020s | 0.3507 | 0.1975 | 0.1532 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest), Armenia or Chile?
- Armenia, at 0.3262 against 0.259 in Chile as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest) between Armenia and Chile?
- 0.0672, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - contributory pensions -1st quintile (poorest)?
- Armenia ranks 12th and Chile ranks 14th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Contributory Pensions -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Contributory Pensions programs (%)