Kyrgyzstan vs Thailand: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest)
Kyrgyzstan
0.3204
in 2020
Thailand
0.3196
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Thailand rank
5th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Thailand
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.3204 against 0.3196 in Thailand, a difference of 0.0008.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Thailand ranks 5th of 36 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1743 | 0.1036 | 0.0707 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 0.307 | 0.3068 | 0.0002 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest), Kyrgyzstan or Thailand?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.3204 against 0.3196 in Thailand as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) between Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 0.0008, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Thailand rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Thailand ranks 5th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)