Kyrgyzstan vs Romania: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest)
Kyrgyzstan
0.3204
in 2020
Romania
0.3468
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan rank
4th
Romania rank
3rd
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.3468 against 0.3204 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0264.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Romania ranks 3rd of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3046 | 0.2823 | 0.0222 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0.3204 | 0.3244 | 0.004 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest), Kyrgyzstan or Romania?
- Romania, at 0.3468 against 0.3204 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) between Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 0.0264, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Romania rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 4th and Romania ranks 3rd of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)