El Salvador vs Kazakhstan: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest)
El Salvador
0.162
in 2022
Kazakhstan
0.1681
in 2021
El Salvador rank
31st
Kazakhstan rank
30th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) over time
- El Salvador
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.1681 against 0.162 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0061.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 31st and Kazakhstan ranks 30th of 36 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2328 | 0.1917 | 0.0411 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 0.1359 | 0.1681 | 0.0322 | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest), El Salvador or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.1681 against 0.162 in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) between El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0061, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Kazakhstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers - 1st quintile (poorest)?
- El Salvador ranks 31st and Kazakhstan ranks 30th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers - 1st quintile (poorest) -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)