Costa Rica vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest)
Costa Rica
0.295
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0.2908
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
7th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Costa Rica
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.295 against 0.2908 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0042.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 35 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2259 | 0.2692 | 0.0433 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 0.2063 | 0.2908 | 0.0845 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest), Costa Rica or Kyrgyzstan?
- Costa Rica, at 0.295 against 0.2908 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) between Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0042, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest)?
- Costa Rica ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)