Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest)
Chile
0.2858
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0.2908
in 2020
Chile rank
11th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.2908 against 0.2858 in Chile, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2705 | 0.2578 | 0.0127 | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.2295 | 0.2908 | 0.0614 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest), Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.2908 against 0.2858 in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest) between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.005, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - all private transfers -1st quintile (poorest)?
- Chile ranks 11th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - All Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Private Transfers programs (%)