Dominican Republic vs Ecuador: Beneficiary incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%)
Dominican Republic
1.2%
in 2021
Ecuador
0.8%
in 2022
Dominican Republic rank
23rd
Ecuador rank
25th
Beneficiary incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 1.2% against 0.8% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 23rd and Ecuador ranks 25th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.1% | 4.3% | 1.8% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 2.5% | 2.9% | 0.3% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 1.3% | 0.1% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%), Dominican Republic or Ecuador?
- Dominican Republic, at 1.2% against 0.8% in Ecuador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) between Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 0.4%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Ecuador?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Ecuador rank globally for beneficiary incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 23rd and Ecuador ranks 25th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in extreme poor (<$2.15 a day) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population