Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory
Dominican Republic
28.4%
in 2021
Pakistan
27.2%
in 2018
Dominican Republic rank
14th
Pakistan rank
15th
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory over time
- Dominican Republic
- Pakistan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 28.4% against 27.2% in Pakistan, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 15th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.4% | 27.1% | 2.2% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 23.9% | 29.7% | 5.7% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory, Dominican Republic or Pakistan?
- Dominican Republic, at 28.4% against 27.2% in Pakistan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory between Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 1.2%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Dominican Republic and Pakistan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
- Dominican Republic ranks 14th and Pakistan ranks 15th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population