Peru vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private
Peru
21.3%
in 2022
Serbia
20.9%
in 2022
Peru rank
16th
Serbia rank
18th
Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 21.3% against 20.9% in Serbia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Peru ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 18th of 35 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.4% | 23.7% | 0.2% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 22.4% | 24.5% | 2.0% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private, Peru or Serbia?
- Peru, at 21.3% against 20.9% in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private between Peru and Serbia?
- 0.4%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private?
- Peru ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 18th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population