Ecuador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Ecuador
22.0%
in 2022
Mongolia
22.8%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
25th
Mongolia rank
22nd
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Ecuador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 22.8% against 22.0% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 25th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 35 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.2% | 20.6% | 3.6% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 24.1% | 22.8% | 1.4% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Ecuador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 22.8% against 22.0% in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 0.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and Mongolia ranks 22nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population