Dominican Republic vs Romania: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Dominican Republic
22.3%
in 2021
Romania
23.9%
in 2021
Dominican Republic rank
23rd
Romania rank
20th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Dominican Republic
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 23.9% against 22.3% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Romania ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 23rd and Romania ranks 20th of 37 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.2% | 21.8% | 1.6% | Romania |
| 2010s | 22.1% | 22.8% | 0.7% | Romania |
| 2020s | 22.3% | 23.9% | 1.5% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Dominican Republic or Romania?
- Romania, at 23.9% against 22.3% in Dominican Republic as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Dominican Republic and Romania?
- 1.6%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Dominican Republic and Romania rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Dominican Republic ranks 23rd and Romania ranks 20th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population