El Salvador vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
El Salvador
19.7%
in 2022
Mongolia
20.3%
in 2020
El Salvador rank
16th
Mongolia rank
13th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- El Salvador
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 20.3% against 19.7% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.9% | 20.9% | 0.0% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 20.6% | 20.0% | 0.6% | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, El Salvador or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 20.3% against 19.7% in El Salvador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 0.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- El Salvador ranks 16th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population