Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Ecuador
17.2%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
16.6%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
26th
Kyrgyzstan rank
29th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 17.2% against 16.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 26th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.5% | 21.0% | 2.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 19.2% | 16.6% | 2.6% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 17.2% against 16.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Ecuador ranks 26th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population