Chile vs Kyrgyzstan: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Chile
16.0%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
16.6%
in 2020
Chile rank
30th
Kyrgyzstan rank
29th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Chile
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 16.6% against 16.0% in Chile, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Chile ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.0% | 19.8% | 3.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 16.9% | 16.6% | 0.3% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Chile or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 16.6% against 16.0% in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Chile ranks 30th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 29th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population