Mongolia vs South Africa: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Mongolia
24.7%
in 2020
South Africa
25.9%
in 2021
Mongolia rank
3rd
South Africa rank
2nd
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Mongolia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 25.9% against 24.7% in Mongolia, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was South Africa ahead.
Mongolia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 18.2% | 19.8% | 1.6% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 24.7% | 23.1% | 1.5% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Mongolia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 25.9% against 24.7% in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Mongolia and South Africa?
- 1.2%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and South Africa rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Mongolia ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 2nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population