Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Mongolia
24.7%
in 2020
Poland
23.6%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
3rd
Poland rank
4th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 24.7% against 23.6% in Poland, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Poland ahead.
Mongolia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 4th of 35 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.8% | 20.6% | 1.9% | Poland |
| 2010s | 19.5% | 20.6% | 1.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Mongolia or Poland?
- Mongolia, at 24.7% against 23.6% in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Mongolia and Poland?
- 1.1%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Mongolia ranks 3rd and Poland ranks 4th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population