Mongolia vs Peru: Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Mongolia
24.7%
in 2020
Peru
22.9%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
3rd
Peru rank
6th
Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 24.7% against 22.9% in Peru, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.
Mongolia ranks 3rd and Peru ranks 6th of 35 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.3% | 22.4% | 1.1% | Peru |
| 2010s | 19.3% | 23.5% | 4.2% | Peru |
| 2020s | 24.7% | 26.0% | 1.4% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 24.7% against 22.9% in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers between Mongolia and Peru?
- 1.8%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Mongolia ranks 3rd and Peru ranks 6th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population