Ecuador vs Kazakhstan, Republic of: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Ecuador
18.4%
in 2022
Kazakhstan, Republic of
18.4%
in 2021
Ecuador rank
23rd
Kazakhstan, Republic of rank
24th
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Ecuador
- Kazakhstan, Republic of
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 18.4% against 18.4% in Kazakhstan, Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Kazakhstan, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 23rd and Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 24th of 36 countries.
Kazakhstan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kazakhstan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.9% | 18.9% | 3.0% | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
| 2020s | 14.6% | 18.1% | 3.4% | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Ecuador or Kazakhstan, Republic of?
- Ecuador, at 18.4% against 18.4% in Kazakhstan, Republic of as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Ecuador and Kazakhstan, Republic of?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kazakhstan, Republic of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Ecuador and Kazakhstan, Republic of rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Ecuador ranks 23rd and Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 24th of 36 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population