Mongolia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Mongolia
19.1%
in 2020
Poland
19.2%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
18th
Poland rank
16th
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 19.2% against 19.1% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Poland ahead.
Mongolia ranks 18th and Poland ranks 16th of 32 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.0% | 21.1% | 1.1% | Poland |
| 2010s | 20.3% | 20.1% | 0.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 19.2% against 19.1% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Mongolia and Poland?
- 0.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Mongolia ranks 18th and Poland ranks 16th of 32 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population