Ecuador vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Ecuador
22.4%
in 2022
Serbia
23.0%
in 2022
Ecuador rank
5th
Serbia rank
4th
Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Ecuador
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 23.0% against 22.4% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 4th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.1% | 23.7% | 2.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 21.5% | 19.6% | 1.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Ecuador or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 23.0% against 22.4% in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Ecuador and Serbia?
- 0.6%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Ecuador ranks 5th and Serbia ranks 4th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 3rd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population