Mongolia vs Uruguay: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Mongolia
17.9%
in 2020
Uruguay
18.6%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
15th
Uruguay rank
13th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 18.6% against 17.9% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 35 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.3% | 18.5% | 0.8% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 20.4% | 18.8% | 1.6% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 17.9% | 18.2% | 0.3% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 18.6% against 17.9% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 0.7%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Mongolia ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population