Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Costa Rica
16.0%
in 2022
Mongolia
17.9%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
20th
Mongolia rank
17th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 17.9% against 16.0% in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.9%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.3% | 19.3% | 2.0% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 15.2% | 20.4% | 5.2% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 13.1% | 17.9% | 4.8% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 17.9% against 16.0% in Costa Rica as of 2020.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 1.9%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Costa Rica ranks 20th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population