Mongolia vs Uruguay: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Mongolia
18.6%
in 2020
Uruguay
18.8%
in 2022
Mongolia rank
16th
Uruguay rank
15th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Mongolia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 18.8% against 18.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Uruguay ahead.
Mongolia ranks 16th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.5% | 18.7% | 1.2% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 21.7% | 18.8% | 3.0% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 18.6% | 17.9% | 0.7% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Mongolia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 18.8% against 18.6% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 0.2%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Uruguay rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Mongolia ranks 16th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population