Armenia vs Poland: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions
Armenia
20.2%
in 2022
Poland
20.7%
in 2019
Armenia rank
7th
Poland rank
4th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 20.7% against 20.2% in Armenia, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Armenia ranks 7th and Poland ranks 4th of 33 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.8% | 20.0% | 0.2% | Poland |
| 2010s | 21.1% | 20.1% | 0.9% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 20.7% against 20.2% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions between Armenia and Poland?
- 0.5%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions?
- Armenia ranks 7th and Poland ranks 4th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population