Georgia vs Serbia: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
Georgia
20.0%
in 2021
Serbia
19.6%
in 2022
Georgia rank
20th
Serbia rank
21st
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 20.0% against 19.6% in Serbia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 21st of 37 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.1% | 19.0% | 0.1% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 20.0% | 18.1% | 1.9% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, Georgia or Serbia?
- Georgia, at 20.0% against 19.6% in Serbia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.4%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- Georgia ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 21st of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population