El Salvador vs Romania: Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers
El Salvador
20.3%
in 2022
Romania
21.2%
in 2021
El Salvador rank
19th
Romania rank
16th
Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers over time
- El Salvador
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 21.2% against 20.3% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 19th and Romania ranks 16th of 37 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.6% | 16.2% | 4.4% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 21.1% | 17.9% | 3.2% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 19.8% | 21.2% | 1.4% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers, El Salvador or Romania?
- Romania, at 21.2% against 20.3% in El Salvador as of 2021.
- What is the difference in beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers between El Salvador and Romania?
- 0.9%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do El Salvador and Romania rank globally for beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - all private transfers?
- El Salvador ranks 19th and Romania ranks 16th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Beneficiary incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of program beneficiaries in a quintile relative to the total number of beneficiaries in the population